A challenge? - I always love a challenge...
So, the question was: how to make a three-layer weave, with warp-wise layer changes?
(and preferably on 12 shafts "only")
This is how I approached the problem:
(To all Swedish readers (and Ellen: hi, Ellen!): note that all tieups are for rising shed. This means that the layers/colours will be reversed if the tieup is used "as is" for a CM.)
Started with a three-layer (three independent layers) weave - for plainweave layers, that takes six shafts.
For instance like this:
I made the top layer turquoise, the middle layer purple, the bottom layer red-orange. The three layers do not interact at any point. (Note that the difference in nuances between warp and weft makes It easy to see that the bottom, red-orange, layer has a correct interlacement, even without using the "back view".)
Now, we wanted a lengthwise (warpwise) layer exchange. I decided the left hand side is a good place. Thus, to start the construction, assume another "block" of the same threading and colour to occur at the left side. Like so (left pic):
The same threading on a new set of shafts (= a new block), with the same colour order. We want to shift the layers, so I let them "cycle": the middle, purple, layer goes on top - the bottom, red, goes in the middle and the top, turquoise, layer has to go to the bottom.
OK, I hear you: how do I do this?
I am using Fiberworks PCW (silver, if that matters).
By clicking in the drawdown, I can get ends/picks to the top (for instance).
Middle pic above: all purple threads, both warp ends and picks, are taken to the top.
Next is to fix the interlacement: right-hand pic above. Note that the interlacement should be a continuation of the purple plainweave in the right-hand (first) three-layer block.
Now to fix the middle layer, the red-orange one. Click all ends and picks so that they are under the purple layer, but on top of the turquoise (left picture below). Fix the interlacement - easy because of the difference between the red and the orange - right-hand picture below.
For the bottom (turquoise) layer, it is easier to use "back view".
As it happens, all turquoise threads are already at the bottom... fix the interlacement, go back to "front" view again:
Unfortunately, all the 12 shafts are now used.
As we want another stripe, we add another block (6 shafts) - now the total is 18.
The same procedure again: make the red-orange layer top, the turquoise will be in the middle and the purple layer will go to the bottom layer:
In the hopes that I had missed something important, I let the software analyse my result - alas, I had not: it really takes 18 shafts to do this.
What if: let one of the layers stay in the same position for two stripes: this will reduce the goal to two blocks. With the three "open" layers on the right-hand side of different widths, and several narrow-ish stripes on the left-hand side... voilà, only 12 shafts. An alternative?
(As I, personally, prefer straight threadings whenever possible, I rearranged it for this final picture, showing both front and back:
(Remember: click pictures to enlargen)
Posted by Kerstin på Spinnhuset at 12:29
Labels: block weave, plain weave, triple layers, weave construction
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you very much indeed, Kerstin!! I'll be working from your suggestions onwards. Like you I much prefer my drafts as "neat" as possible. You desribe your progress very well, - so it is great that you took up the challenge :)
Aah, Kerstin, if you look at my doodle on Ravelry, I only really calculated with two blocks, didn't I? One going red-yellow-black, another one going black-red-yellow. Isn't that just two blocks?
And another question: Now I had already had in mind to have an open selvedge on the right side, but why do you consider it a prerequisite for your two-block draft? Will there be different draw-in taking place or something else I haven't even considered?
And a third question: how do you go about a middle layer? I have no problems understanding double weave and how you make sure one layer stays at the bottom and one at the top, what makes my mind start spinning whenever I get to it is ahhh .... Where do you want the middle layer to be in your tie-up? You raise all top layer shafts plus one of the middle layer, then lower all of the bottom layer plus one of the middle layer? Is that sort of getting close?
Sorry to be such a mind-picker! :)
Ellen - you are right, of course: there are only two blocks in your doodle! (My thought was that one would like to show all three layers on the top, just to make everybody notice there *are* three layers... )
My putting the open end to the right was just to make my intention clear - not everybody would have read your "challenge" :-)
Middle layer: I guess you mean the shedding order? Yes, one pick is top and middle1 raised, bottom and middle2 lowered. Next comes top and middle2 raised, bottom and middle1 lowered. (more on shedding/treadling order in today's post)
Post a Comment